The tiny
tent measure 1.5 x 1.2 metres at the base and is about 800mm
high, there is no floor, and one of the long sides has a zip
to form a door.
Around all
sides there is a 100mm skirt on which I place rocks to hold
the tent down.
Naturally
such a small tent doesn't shelter all of me, it's just designed
to cover my head and shoulders while the rest of me is covered
by a bivy bag.
So why
such a small tent?
Well, as already mentioned, it's very light (1kg with
poles) but it also fits just about anywhere. I can easily
set it up on a razorback ridge for example.
Why hold
it down with stones?
When initially designed most of my bushwalking was to the
top of mountains in the Budawang ranges. These mesa-topped
mountains often have no soil, just rock, so it was not possible
to use tent pegs.
But you
also need other stuff, how much does it all weight?
True, for full shelter I need a bivy bag and ground sheet,
total weight 1750gms.
But Macpac
make really light tent.
Yes, last time I looked the Microlight weighed 1900gms. Certainly
if you are in exposed areas like the high country then a real
tent is a much better idea. However in some terrain the combination
of tiny tent and bivy bag is more versatile.
What
do you mean more versatile?
In many parts of Australia it is quite possible to sleep under
overhangs, large rocks or with no shelter at all. With this
setup I can have fairly good shelter almost regardless of
the terrain. Also, if I find a nice rock to sleep under I
don't need to use the tent, and have only carried 1kg of extra
weight unnecessarily.
What
are the down sides?
Obviously it's very small so the idea of being tent bound
for three days (which I have been on several occasions in
normal tents) does not thrill me. Also, in mountainous areas,
prone to seriously bad weather, the tiny tent would not be
safe.
|