| |
I found this unusual rock on top of
the cliffs at Lucky Bay in the Cape le Grand National Park.
The first shot I took is shown below. |
|
|
| Fig 1: With a
14mm, my first shot of the rock. |
 |
|
| |
| It
doesn't show the rock's real shape at all, but then as
photographers we're not necessarily in the game of realistic
portrayals. It's a nice composition, but I thought I'd
play with some different angles, lenses and times of day. |
|
|
| Fig 2: 24mm |

|
|
| Fig 3: 24mm,
this time we're starting to see the rock's real shape, rather like a rhinoceros. |
 |
|
| Fig 4: 24mm right
in close to accentuate the "head" of the rhino. |
 |
|
| Fig 5: 24mm showing
some background to put the rock in context. |
 |
|
| Fig 6: 85mm,
showing the same background but compressing the perspective. Now the rock
is less significant in the shot and the background plays a larger role.' |
 |
|
| Fig 7: And just
for something completely different, a 24mm shot from the "rear"
of the rock. It's no longer recognisable as the same object. |
 |
|
| |
Of course there's a thousand other
angles, lightings and perspectives possible, but I think you get
the idea.
If you have enough film at the time (no excuses
now with digital) it makes sense to "work" the subject,
often the composition you thought was best at the time turns out
not to be so. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |